Now, top NBC executives told media commentator and former NBC reporter Dylan Byers: 'Nicolle is the most obvious in-house candidate' to replace her.
#NICOLE WALLACE DRONE STRIKE PROFESSIONAL#
She has been signaling for years that she has planned to step down from her nightly show, citing professional burnout.As part of the $30 million per year contact, Maddow has the option of ending her nightly show on April 30, 2022.Maddow renewed her contract with NBCUniversal last month to stay on the network through the 2024 election cycle.Bush, is reportedly seen as the favorite to replace Rachel Maddow on MSNBC Nicolle Wallace, the communications director under former President George W.MSNBC contributor Clint Watts saying that if what President Trump said had been said by fellow US citizen Anwar Awlaki, "we would be talking about a drone strike," was sponsored in part by NewDay AT&T.Ex-Bush administration official Nicolle Wallace 'is seen by NBC network execs as most likely candidate to replace Rachel Maddow' - who could step down from her nightly show in April Wallace teed up Watts to make his extreme statement by suggesting that you have to deal with domestic terror by dealing with those inciting it. His killing via drone strike was ordered by President Barack Obama. Note that Awlaki, a recruiter and organizer of terrorist attacks for al-Qaeda, was a US-born, US citizen.
So that's one aspect of our political leaders talking about this rhetoric. If you took what President Trump said, and you instead put it in Anwar Awalki’s mouth, we would be talking about a drone strike overseas. So, as Myles was talking about, he's exactly right. Which is, can you get way up, up the stream of an attack and start to root out all of the confluences which bring about that attack? We had a period after 9/11, where we were trying to get "left of boom" as they would say in counter-terrorism. You’ll always be on your heels, you'll always be reactive. How do you deal with a domestic-terror threat without dealing with those inciting it and spreading it?ĬLINT WATTS: Nicolle, you can’t. It always starts at the other end of the fish’s head, and goes to the incitement, the people sending out messages.
I don’t know of any examples where they simply go to the crime scene and deal with the person who was radicalized to carry out violence. There are not two sides to be taken on the question of incitement.Īnd Clint Watts, I'd like you to speak about fighting terrorism, just generally, and as an art and a science. And this should come from every Democrat: you're either with them, or with us. NICOLLE WALLACE: I wouldn't waste my breath with them And I'd say to Democrats, it's time to roll out a terrorism-era choice for Republicans. WHAT? How is that not incitement to violence? How is that not inciting left-wing extremists to believe that President Trump deserves to be assassinated? According to Watts's bio, he's " a national security contributor for NBC News and MSNBC."
0 kommentar(er)
